[Systers-dev] Database Schema for Message Storing

[Jennifer Redman]

On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 3:24 AM, Yian Shang <yian.shang at gmail.com> wrote:

>
> Actually, currently the db is still PostgreSQL (I was following along what
> was being used for dlist-storing), and it's just for storing messages (it
> basically replaces mbox files). I didn't realize that Mailman 3 was using
> SQLite; it would be more consistent to go along with that. And I think the
> fact that it's so hard to decide exactly which database to use is good
> reason for the abstraction--if we eventually want to try out some new one
> it'd be easier to do so (hopefully!).


The ability to use any sql-based db would be ideal and it's even better if
our development is in tandem with MM 3.0 development.

I think at this point it's a good idea to stick with Postgresql and start
considering other options in the next phase of the project.

Jen

Jen

Jen