[Systers-dev] GSoC Test Cycles 3 and 4

Anna Granudd anna.granudd at gmail.com
Tue Aug 11 08:18:32 PDT 2009


Just discovered a bug when trying to look at the listinfo page of an already
created list, since the questions wasn't saved the same way then as they are
now we get a crash. I'll work on a fix and commit it to the wishlist branch.

Anna

On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 4:37 PM, Jenred <jenred at gmail.com> wrote:

>
>
>
>
> On Aug 11, 2009, at 7:17, Anna Granudd <anna.granudd at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 4:05 PM, Jenred <jenred at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Aug 11, 2009, at 2:15, Anna Granudd <anna.granudd at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>  I'm not quite sure how to check that my changes made it through, any tips
>>> on how to do this? Can I simply just test the features/changes I did and see
>>> if they work or do you want me to do it somehow else?
>>>
>>
>> You can always ssh into abiwt and check the log (bzr log) and then do a
>> couple # less <filename> on files you know you've changed.
>>
>>
>>  So far I created a list called 'wishlist', password 'admin', that we can
>>> use for testing. However some of the things implemented will require more
>>> lists being created. I figured I could add what needs to be tested to the
>>> checklist you created and then I'll start running tests. I'm not sure
>>> whether to test everything on the checklist for each list we create, many of
>>> them doesn't affect more than for instance subscription but that is up to
>>> you Jen/Robin/Andy/Annie? to decide.
>>>
>>
>> What do you think is the best approach?
>>
>>  Jen
>
>
> I don't think it's necessary to run all tests twice (or more) due to every
> change or bug fix, but I do think we should test the most important things
> for non dlists as well, not just dlists. This due to the one bug that only
> allowed us to really create dlists earlier. So far (today) I only tested
> things for dlists on abiwt.org, indicating that much of what's left is
> that we'll need to run tests on non dlists. I could add some things to test
> to the checklist and after that - could you please say if it's enough/too
> much?
>
>
> Sounds like a good plan. Also make sure you are updating the bugs as the
> fix appears to pass.
>
> Jen
>
>
>


More information about the Systers-dev mailing list